|
|
COMMUNITY NEEDS
To determine the kinds of needs individuals living in
Kendall County might have, respondents were asked about problems that
families living in their neighborhood might experience, and were provided
a list of eighteen different problems. The list of problems included :
Streets are in poor condition; Fire station too far; Lack of police
protection; Lack of emergency health services; Too much commercial development;
Drainage/Flooding problems during rain; Neighborhood safety; Traffic Congestion;
Lack of parks and recreation areas; Lack of close shopping (groceries,
cleaners, etc.); Lack of child care; Lack of transportation; Crime (ie.,
violence or theft); Drug abuse; Uncontrolled growth; Lack of development
planning (zoning); Lack of cultural opportunities; Lack of continuing
education; Lack of affordable housing; and Lack of employment opportunities.
* In the order presented in the survey
Individuals could select more than one of these choices.
About one fourth of respondents selected only one problem, while a little
over 14% mentioned two. Thirteen percent of respondents said they were
not aware of any problems that families in their neighborhood experienced.
At the opposite end of the spectrum a few individuals mentioned that families
in their neighborhood experienced as many as 15 of the problems (see Figure
17).

Figure 18 displays those problems which were mentioned
by the largest percentage of respondents. Uncontrolled growth was the
most frequently cited problem, cited by 36.1% of respondents. Lack of
affordable housing and too much commercial development both had about
30% of respondents stating they are a problem. About one fourth of the
respondents mentioned that a lack of development planning (zoning) was
a problem, and about one fifth mentioned lack of streets in poor condition
and employment opportunities. The problems with the next largest percentage
of affirmative responses were traffic congestion (17.7%), lack of close
shopping such as groceries and cleaners (16.7%), lack of cultural opportunities
(16.7%), lack of continuing education (15.6%), and lack of emergency health
services (15.3%).

Figure 19 arranges those problems that were least cited
by respondents in order of response. Fire station too far, drainage or
flooding problems when it rains and lack of transportation were mentioned
by about 14% of respondents. Lack of parks and recreation areas was mentioned
by 10.6% of individuals. About eight percent of the respondents mentioned
lack of childcare and drug abuse as problems. Nearly six percent mentioned
neighborhood safety and lack of police protection as problems experienced
by families in their neighborhoods. Finally 4.5% of respondents said that
crime such as theft or violence were problems experienced in their neighborhoods.

Table 4 indicates the one problem among those mentioned
that the respondent considered the most serious for their neighborhood.
Uncontrolled growth received the largest percentage of responses (19.2%)
and lack of affordable housing was the next most frequently mentioned
(11.1%). The rest of the problems were selected by less than 10% of respondents
as the most serious. Lack of continuing education received the smallest
percentage of responses (0.9%).
Table 4: The Most Serious Problem Experienced by
Families in Your Neighborhood
| Uncontrolled growth |
19.2% |
| Lack of Affordable housing |
11.1% |
| Streets in poor condition |
7.8% |
| Lack of developmental planning (zoning) |
7.8% |
| Too much commercial development |
7.5% |
| Traffic congestion |
6.0% |
| Drainage or Flooding when it rains |
5.1% |
| Lack of close shopping (food, cleaners, etc.) |
4.8% |
| Fire Station too far |
4.8% |
| Drug abuse |
4.5% |
| Lack of employment opportunities |
4.5% |
| Lack of emergency health services |
4.2% |
| Crime (i.e. violence or theft) |
2.1% |
| Neighborhood safety |
1.8% |
| Lack of parks and recreation areas |
1.8% |
| Lack of transportation |
1.8% |
| Lack of cultural opportunities |
1.8% |
| Lack of Police protection |
1.5% |
| Lack of child care |
1.2% |
| Lack of continuing education |
0.9% |
Respondents were also asked the following: The County
governments in Texas often provide a variety of services designed to help
individuals and families. We are going to name some services and we want
you to tell us which ones you believe are important for helping people
in your community. Figure 20 displays the responses to this question.

Respondents clearly thought that providing each of these
services was important to the community. Between 41% and 78% of respondents
said that each of these services is important. Fire protection (78.3%),
police protection (76.4%) and emergency medical services (74.5%) were
selected most frequently. Services for the disabled and juvenile probation
were selected by over 50% of those answering the survey. Over 47% of respondents
said that providing counseling services was important, 42% mentioned adult
literacy programs, and 41% mentioned fair housing services
In addition individuals were asked about the importance
of services provided by private or public agencies other than the County.
Figure 21 those services mentioned as important for their community. With
the exception of fire and police protection and emergency medical services,
all of these other services had a larger percentage of individuals stating
the service was important for their community. Elder care and emergency
services (food, money, shelter) had the largest percentage of individuals
saying they were important. Parenting education had the smallest percentage
claiming it, however, a majority of respondents thought it was important
for the community.

Affordable housing is an important issue for County
officials to consider. Respondents who said that a lack of affordable
housing was a problem in Kendall County were most frequently in the 40
year old age group, to have family income between $21,000 and $50,000
and to say they live in Boerne. Overall, sex or race/ethnicity of the
individual made no difference in mentioning affordable housing as a problem,
and age and income differences were quite small. Those living in Welfare/Waring
and in unincorporated areas of the county also had a high percentage saying
there was a lack of affordable housing (33%). Individuals within all employment
categories except those currently in school were somewhat likely to state
that there was a lack of affordable housing. Not surprisingly individuals
who said they were currently unemployed were most likely to say that affordable
housing was a problem, although about one third of those employed full
time, employed part time or who said they were stay home parents also
mentioned lack of affordable housing (see, Figures 22 - 25).




Another interesting issue for rural counties ties to
employment opportunities. Those respondents most likely to say that lack
of employment opportunities in Kendall County was a problem said they
lived in Comfort or Kendalia, reported their age between 40 and 49 and
reported family incomes between $51,000 and $69,000 (see Figures 26-29).



There were no statistically significant differences
across categories of sex or race/ethnicity in selecting lack of employment
opportunities as a serious problem. (see Figures 30,31).

Another interesting issue relates to those individuals
who say they are dissatisfied with the quality of their housing. Keeping
in mind that only twelve respondents reported being dissatisfied, Figures
32 - 36 illustrate the groups who were most likely to report dissatisfaction.
Those most likely to express dissatisfaction with the quality of their
housing they lived in "other" unidentified parts of Kendall County, reported
being in school, said their family income was between $1,000 and $20,000
and were between the ages of 40 and 49.



Overall, respondents reported being in either excellent
or good health (see Figure 37), although 11% reported their health as
fair and 4% reported their health as poor. Mexican Americans were those
with the highest percentage claiming only fair health, and whites were
the group with the highest percentage claiming poor health (see Figure
38).

Increasing age and lower family incomes are both risk
factors related to reporting health status as fair or poor (see Figures
39 and 40).

Related to the issue of health is the type of health
insurance individuals are able to purchase. As seen in Figure 41, close
to 50% of the respondents had employer based health insurance, about 19%
had private insurance, 15% had medicare coverage, about 6% said they had
military health benefits, another 6% said they had some other type of
health insurance, and about 1% were covered under medicaid. Importantly
with respect to the needs of residents, about 7% said they had no health
insurance coverage at all. Since a single question focuses on the respondent
only, this figure may underestimate the proportion of households in which
at least one member is without health insurance benefits. As seen in Figure
42, among those with no health insurance, the largest percentage say their
health is poor, and the next largest group say their health is poor.


Figures 43-46 present a profile of those most at risk
for being without health insurance. Respondents who were women, Mexican
Americans, those between 40 and 49 years old, and those with family earnings
between $1,000 and $20,000 are most likely to say they had no insurance.


As shown in Figure 47, Kendall County residents are
clearly concerned with the future water supply. This concern was reflected
by both sexes, across race and ethnic, age and income groups and regardless
of where in the County individuals lived.

|
 |